5øre2 udfordring4

The attached scan (sorry I have to switch to English again, it's getting complicated !?), which I also received from Henrik Stilling (tak igen, Henrik!)

puzzled me quite a long time. From the perforation it is clear, that the stamps are from row 8 - 10. The left stamp has a clear RM.4A, but Lasse

doesn't have a RM.4A in row 8 ?! (See pg. 1447) After examining the scan he wrote: "...the left stamp with RM.4A looks a lot like my 20.39..."

But Lasse had also noted a four-strip 20.37 - 20.38 - 20.39 - 20.40 ??! LN: "However, the strip (from an old photo) is sitting on a piece and may not

be a a strip of four after all" ... Checking Lasse's plating I found, that the perforation of his stamp on position 39 looks very much like row 8 !?

So the shown three-strip should be the "irregular" combination 20.39 - 20.79 - 20.90.

Mange hilsener! Bernd

5ø2 En udfordring, altid! (IV) - 19.06.2008
Indsendt af:. maj-juni 2008 - Bernd Stein
	Setting
Indsend en kommentar	Tilbage til forside
The attached scan (sorry I have to switch to English again, it's getting complicated !?), which I also received from Henrik Stilling (tak igen, Henrik!) puzzled me quite a long time. From the perforation it is clear, that the stamps are from row 8 - 10. The left stamp has a clear RM.4A, but Lasse doesn't have a RM.4A in row 8 ?! (See pg. 1447) After examining the scan he wrote: "...the left stamp with RM.4A looks a lot like my 20.39..." But Lasse had also noted a four-strip 20.37 - 20.38 - 20.39 - 20.40 ??! LN: "However, the strip (from an old photo) is sitting on a piece and may not be a a strip of four after all" ... Checking Lasse's plating I found, that the perforation of his stamp on position 39 looks very much like row 8 !? So the shown three-strip should be the "irregular" combination 20.39 - 20.79 - 20.90. Mange hilsener! Bernd